SLC1A1 mediated glutamine addiction and contributed to natural killer T-cell lymphoma progression with immunotherapeutic potential.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic reprogramming plays an essential role on lymphoma progression. Dysregulation of glutamine metabolism is implicated in natural-killer T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) and tumor cell response to asparaginase-based anti-metabolic treatment. METHODS: To understand the metabolomic alterations and determine the potential therapeutic target of asparaginase, we assessed metabolomic profile using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in serum samples of 36 NKTCL patients, and integrated targeted metabolic analysis and RNA sequencing in tumor samples of 102 NKTCL patients. The biological function of solute carrier family 1 member 1 (SLC1A1) on metabolic flux, lymphoma cell growth, and drug sensitivity was further examined in vitro in NK-lymphoma cell line NK-92 and SNK-6, and in vivo in zebrafish xenograft models. FINDINGS: In NKTCL patients, serum metabolomic profile was characterized by aberrant glutamine metabolism and SLC1A1 was identified as a central regulator of altered glutaminolysis. Both in vitro and in vivo, ectopic expression of SLC1A1 increased cellular glutamine uptake, enhanced glutathione metabolic flux, and induced glutamine addiction, leading to acceleration of cell proliferation and tumor growth. Of note, SLC1A1 overexpression was significantly associated with PD-L1 downregulation and reduced cytotoxic CD3+/CD8+ T cell activity when co-cultured with peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Asparaginase treatment counteracted SLC1A1-mediated glutamine addiction, restored SLC1A1-induced impaired T-cell immunity. Clinically, high EAAT3 (SLC1A1-encoded protein) expression independently predicted superior progression-free and overall survival in 90 NKTCL patients treated with asparaginase-based regimens. INTERPRETATION: SLC1A1 functioned as an extracellular glutamine transporter, promoted tumor growth through reprogramming glutamine metabolism of NKTCL, while rendered tumor cells sensitive to asparaginase treatment. Moreover, SLC1A1-mediated modulation of PD-L1 expression might provide clinical rationale of co-targeting metabolic vulnerability and immunosuppressive microenvironment in NKTCL. FUNDING: This study was supported, in part, by research funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82130004, 81830007 and 81900192), Chang Jiang Scholars Program, Shanghai Municipal Education Commission Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (20152206 and 20152208), Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (2020CR1032B), Multicenter Clinical Research Project by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (DLY201601), Shanghai Chenguang Program (19CG15), Shanghai Sailing Program (19YF1430800), Medical-Engineering Cross Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (ZH2018QNA46), and Shanghai Yi Yuan Xin Xing Program.

Specificity controls for immunocytochemistry: the antigen preadsorption test can lead to inaccurate assessment of antibody specificity.

The biomedical research community relies directly or indirectly on immunocytochemical data. Unfortunately, validation of labeling specificity is difficult. A common specificity test is the preadsorption test. This test was intended for testing crude antisera but is now frequently used to validate monoclonal and affinity purified polyclonal antibodies. Here, the authors assess the power of this test. Nine affinity purified antibodies to different epitopes on 3 proteins (EAAT3, slc1a1; EAAT2, slc1a2; BGT1, slc6a12) were tested on samples (tissue sections and Western blots with or without fixation). The selected antibodies displayed some degree of cross-reactivity as defined by labeling of samples from knockout mice. The authors show that antigen preadsorption blocked all labeling of both wild-type and knockout samples, implying that preadsorption also blocked binding to cross-reactive epitopes. They show how this can give an illusion of specificity and illustrate sensitivity-specificity relationships, the importance of good negative controls, that fixation can create new epitopes, and that cross-reacting epitopes present in sections may not be present on Western blots and vice versa. In conclusion, they argue against uncritical use of the preadsorption test and, in doing so, address a number of other issues related to immunocytochemistry specificity testing.

Specificity of antibodies: unexpected cross-reactivity of antibodies directed against the excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (EAAT3).

UNLABELLED: Specific antibodies are essential tools for identifying individual proteins in biological samples. While generation of antibodies is often straightforward, determination of the antibody specificity is not. Here we illustrate this by describing the production and characterization of antibodies to excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (EAAT3). We synthesized 13 peptides corresponding to parts of the EAAT3 sequence and immunized 6 sheep and 30 rabbits. All sera were affinity purified against the relevant immobilized peptide. Antibodies to the peptides were obtained in almost all cases. Immunoblotting with tissue extracts from wild type and EAAT3 knockout animals revealed that most of the antibodies did not recognize the native EAAT3 protein, and that some recognized other proteins. Several immunization protocols were tried, but strong reactions with EAAT3 were only seen with antibodies to the C-terminal peptides. In contrast, good antibodies were obtained to several parts of EAAT2. EAAT3 was only detected in neurons. However, rabbits immunized with an EAAT3-peptide corresponding to residues 479-498 produced antibodies that labeled axoplasm and microtubules therein particularly strongly. On blots, these antibodies recognized both EAAT3 and a slightly smaller, but far more abundant protein that turned out to be tubulin. The antibodies were fractionated on columns with immobilized tubulin. One fraction contained antibodies apparently specific for EAAT3 while another fraction contained antibodies recognizing both EAAT3 and tubulin despite the lack of primary sequence identity between the two proteins. Addition of free peptide to the incubation solution blocked immunostaining of both EAAT3 and tubulin. CONCLUSIONS: Not all antibodies to synthetic peptides recognize the native protein. The peptide sequence is more important than immunization protocol. The specificity of an antibody is hard to predict because cross-reactivity can be specific and to unrelated molecules. The antigen preabsorption test is of little value in testing the specificity of affinity purified antibodies.